About the Amicus Library

Welcome to the Amicus Project library.  Here you will find copies of the 400+ legal briefs United Policyholders has filed as an "amicus curiae" (friend of the court) since 1991. We file amicus briefs to help courts respect and effectuate consumers' reasonable expectations of coverage and reach fair results in coverage and claim dispute lawsuits.  In addition to calling courts' attention to helpful legal precedents, UP helps judges consider the impact of their decisions on people and businesses that suffer dire consequences when insurance companies put their own profit motives ahead of their customers' best interests.

The United Policyholders Amicus Project is made possible by the hundreds of dedicated policyholder attorneys who generously volunteer their time to write, review and edit our briefs. Click here to view the attorneys who make up our Amicus Project Team

To request that UP weigh in on a case, please complete this Request Form.

UP chronicled our Amicus Project in a 2011 report titled "Twenty Years Protecting, Defending and Advancing Policyholders Rights

Year:
2017
Court:
Arizona Supreme Court
Issue:
Bad Faith, Punitive Damages
State:
Arizona
Year:
2017
Court:
California Supreme Court
Issue:
Notice Prejudice, Choice of Law, Consent Provisions
State:
California

The notice prejudice rule protects policyholders from undue forfeiture of benefits when they fail to report a claim within the applicable insurance policy's deadline.

Year:
2017
Court:
Texas Supreme Court
Issue:
Duty to Defend, Contra Proferentem/Contract Interpretation
State:
Texas

It is well-settled that Texas courts maintain the value of insurance and keep a level playing field between the state’s residents and insurance companies by applying and enforcing the doctrine of... Read more

Year:
2017
Court:
Issue:
Bad Faith Failure to Settle
State:
California

 

Year:
2017
Court:
Texas Supreme Court
Issue:
Duty to Defend
State:
Texas

 

Year:
2017
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit
Issue:
Bad Faith, Duty to Investigate, Failure to Follow Internal Policies
State:
Arkansas

 

Year:
2017
Court:
Colorado Supreme Court
Issue:
Statute of Limitations, Penal Statutes, Legislative Intent
State:
Colorado

 

Year:
2017
Court:
California Supreme Court
Issue:
Accident/Occurrence, Employee's Torts and Negligence, Employer's Vicarious Liability
State:
California

California courts have long held that liability insurance covers an employer's vicarious liability for employee negligence  as well as intentional torts.

Year:
2017
Court:
Missouri Supreme Court
Issue:
Contract Interpretation, Duty to Defend, Exclusions
State:
Missouri

Insurance companies have the burden to draft express and clear exclusions when they desire to limit the coverage they sell to their policyholders.

Year:
2017
Court:
New Jersey Supreme Court
Issue:
Allocation and Contribution, Unavailability of Insurance
State:
New Jersey

Under the seminal case of Owens-Illinois v. United Ins.