State: 
Florida
Year: 
2018
Case Number: 
No. 18-13172-D
Court: 
Eleventh Circuit
Issue: 
Duty to Defend

In its brief, UP argues that the District Court erred in determining Travelers did not owe a duty to defend based on Exclusion (j)(5).  Examination of the plain language and intent of the exclusion makes clear that the exclusions have a limited application that does not extend to property damage within the prducts-completed operations hazard, but only to property damage that occurs while operations are in progress. 

Author: 
Molly Chafe Brockmeyer